Comment

Labour must not fall back into its divisive stalemate

by: Emma Burnell | on: 04.05.18 | in: Comment | tags:

Unsatisfactory

This was not a night that should satisfy any of us who want to see a Labour government. While Labour made some gains, there weren’t nearly enough. The energy that was built up during and after the General Election campaign last year seems to have dissipated.  Or worse, to be unable to be transferred to non-national elections. That should concern the party of localism and those who want to see Labour in Town Halls across the country.

Depending on where you sit on the Labour spectrum, there will be two responses to this disappointment:

Those who are anti-Corbyn will say that this is not the performance of a party confidently heading towards government.

Those who are pro-Corbyn will argue that Labour did badly in the local elections in 2017. But that they then went on to massively outperform expectations in the general election just a few weeks later.

They are both right.

But in being so it leaves the Party even more obviously in its stalemate than it was before. Both sides believe their thesis and that the only way to prove it is to test it at the next general election. Potentially to destruction – potentially to victory. Either way it leaves Labour’s forever war no closer to resolution and Labour members from all factions and none, who have worked so hard over the past few weeks and months, bruised and disheartened and listening to all sides pull each other apart.

Equally importantly, it leaves Labour running fewer councils, with a smaller bulwark against the brutal Tory cuts. It leaves Labour less able to make a difference in our communities and less able to innovate to deliver – even under the incredibly tough conditions imposed by the centre – locally focussed solutions, for the problems the people who need us, face.

Why was Labour’s performance disappointing?

We will all have our own pet theories. Likely they will align with whatever it was we thought was going wrong before the elections. And we will have nothing to say about what we thought was going right. Politics is a human business after all and we are all only human.

In order to regain some of the momentum from last year, some may try to oversell these results as a triumph. That would be a mistake. Labour is not over the line nationally, which means there is always more to learn, more to do.

Equally, others will revert to the positions they held before June 2017 and claim that a radical, left-wing Labour party is unelectable. That too would be a mistake. Labour increased their vote share dramatically at the last election. We have something the public have demonstrated they are at least open to. We just need now to work out how to ensure we hone that and what it will take to close the deal.

There will be a lot of jumping to conclusions about what it is the public have told us this week. But the truth is we do not yet know. Nor will there be a single homogenous answer. Some things seem clear. The antisemitism row has hurt Labour in Jewish areas and probably beyond. This must now lead to decisive action. But this cannot be the only response.

We are a divided country, but there is not simply one division. We are left and right, leave and remain, open and closed, metropolitan and not, London and not, Northern and Southern, English, Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish. These divisions play out in a myriad of ways. We must understand the best way to appeal to the most people in the most seats. We must do so in a world where we know that what we say in Southend will be heard in Strathclyde. What we promise to Bury will be known in Brighton.

What now?

For Labour to fall back even further into petty infighting would be destructive beyond belief. The way to avoid that is not to enforce a ‘Pollyannaish’ approach to this setback nor to adopt a Chicken little “sky is falling attitude”. It is to look forward, sensibly, to what can be done to address our weaknesses and what can be done to emphasise our strengths.

It is incumbent on all of us to recognise that we have both.

Comments

  • I think we may need to , regardless of broad Church and other redundant ideas, talk seriously about disciplinary hearings against MPs who continuously embarrass the labour party and its members. Their desperation and ludicrous comments are becoming tedious and inspire negativity and division In the party. This poor behavior must stop and action really needs to be taken before the damage becomes irreparable. Its fine to disagree with the leader but these rogue MPs are taking it too far a d doing so very publicly putting the party image in disrepute. I’m not one to break up the band but if the bassist continuously fks up the song. We need a new bassist.

  • The Labour Leadership must respond positively to the majority of the Membership who want to Remain in the EU.

You may also like

Comment
A new party may not be a threat to Corbyn—but his own membership could be by Emma Burnell | 17.01.19 | In: Comment Open Labour Co-Chair has a piece on the Prospect website arguing that the threat to the Corbyn project of disappointing members is not well enough understood.... Read More
Comment
Open Labour: Why you should join our policy conference by Steve Lapsley | 16.01.19 | In: Comment Open Labour National Committee member Steve Lapsley has written for LabourList looking forward to our conference on the 26th January. 2018 was a... Read More
Comment
A better approach to volunteers would be essential to winning a second referendum by Oliver Coppard | 15.01.19 | In: Comment This is the second in a series of reflections on the 2016 referendum campaign from former Field Director of Britain Stronger in Europe for Yorkshire, Oliver... Read More
Comment
Building an Open Left by Sonja Lokar | 10.01.19 | In: Comment The issues for the Open Left are well-known to us. Accelerated globalisation has dramatically altered the social structures of societies in Europe and... Read More